Halloween 2025 Echoes 1938 Panic as Harvard Professor Warns of Alien Object

Posted by Jaxon Kensington
- 23 November 2025 0 Comments

Halloween 2025 Echoes 1938 Panic as Harvard Professor Warns of Alien Object

On October 23, 2025, the world held its breath as Avi Loeb, the Frank B. Baird, Jr. Chair of Science at Harvard University and director of the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, warned that an interstellar object—3I/ATLAS—might be more than just space rock. It could be alien technology. The timing? Just days before Halloween. And for many, the memory of the 1938 War of the Worlds radio broadcastGrovers Mill, New Jersey came rushing back.

The Ghosts of 1938

On October 30, 1938, Orson Welles and his Mercury Theatre on the Air aired a dramatized adaptation of H.G. Wells’ novel as if it were live news. Announcers Carl Phillips and Richard Pierson described Martian cylinders crashing in Grovers Mill, New Jersey, heat rays incinerating towns, and towering tripods leveling New York City. The broadcast was seamless—interrupted by fake static, piano interludes, then returning with panicked voices. Thousands believed it was real. People fled their homes. Some reportedly tried to shoot their radios. Newspapers claimed suicide attempts spiked. The truth? Most listeners had switched stations. But in the dark, pre-TV era, radio was truth. And fear made people forget to verify.

Now, in 2025, Little Bits of Gaming published a retrospective noting how eerily similar the current climate feels. They referenced the late September 2025 Rapture panic, when millions of Americans believed the world would end—only to wake up on September 30 and laugh at themselves. "People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals," the article quoted Agent K from Men in Black. And it wasn’t just a joke. It was a diagnosis.

3I/ATLAS: The Object That Doesn’t Add Up

Detected on July 1, 2025, by the Pan-STARRS telescope in Hawaii, 3I/ATLAS is a 22.7-kilometer-wide object—roughly the size of Manhattan—weighing 33 billion metric tonnes. It’s not just big. It’s wrong. Its emissions include nickel tetracarbonyl, a compound previously only seen in human industrial processes. No iron. No natural explanation. And it’s moving too fast, too cleanly, too deliberately.

Professor Loeb didn’t say it was aliens. He said, "Something about 3I/ATLAS just doesn’t add up." He compared it to Oumuamua, the cigar-shaped object he controversially suggested in 2018 might be alien tech. He added, "It may come to save us or destroy us. If you want to take a vacation, take it before that date [October 29]. Because who knows what will happen."

October 29, 2025, passed without incident. 3I/ATLAS reached perihelion—its closest point to the Sun—without incident. But Loeb’s point wasn’t about the Sun. It was about the next phase: a potential Earth approach window between November 21 and December 5, 2025. That’s when the real anxiety kicked in.

NASA’s Reassurance and the Public’s Doubt

On October 23, the same day Loeb’s warning went viral, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California issued a calm, technical statement: "3I/ATLAS poses no threat to Earth and will pass safely through the inner solar system." Their data was clear. Trajectory confirmed. No collision risk. No gravitational disruption.

But trust in institutions is fragile. After years of misinformation, conspiracy theories, and pandemic-era confusion, many people didn’t trust NASA. They trusted Loeb. He’s a Harvard professor. He’s bold. He’s unafraid. And he’s right about some things. His work on exoplanets and cosmic anomalies is respected. But his alien hypothesis? That’s the part that makes scientists roll their eyes.

Brian Cox Steps In

Brian Cox Steps In

On October 29, 2025, Professor Brian Cox, the Royal Society Professor for Public Engagement in Science at the University of Manchester, responded to Loeb’s claims via LADbible. His exact words weren’t quoted—but his tone was unmistakable. "Science isn’t about fear," he reportedly said. "It’s about asking questions. And if you’re scared, you’re not thinking clearly."

Journalist Joshua Nair, who wrote the piece for LADbible, noted Cox’s calm demeanor and his frustration with how media amplifies speculation. "We’re not living in 1938," Nair paraphrased Cox. "We have telescopes. We have satellites. We have data. We don’t need to panic because someone says ‘it doesn’t add up.’"

Still, the article went viral. Over 12 million views in 48 hours. Social media flooded with memes: "3I/ATLAS is coming. Buy toilet paper."

Why This Matters Now

This isn’t about aliens. It’s about how easily fear spreads in the digital age. We don’t have radio broadcasts anymore—we have TikTok, Twitter, and YouTube algorithms that reward shock. The 1938 panic was real, but limited by geography. Today, a single tweet from a Harvard professor can trigger global anxiety. And when the Rapture didn’t happen in September, people shrugged. But when an object from interstellar space behaves strangely? That taps into something primal.

Historians are watching. Psychologists are studying. And NASA? They’re quietly updating their public communication protocols. Because next time, it might not be a rock.

What’s Next?

What’s Next?

Between now and December 5, 2025, astronomers worldwide will monitor 3I/ATLAS with unprecedented precision. The European Space Agency and China National Space Administration are coordinating observation efforts. If 3I/ATLAS emits anything new—radio pulses, heat signatures, directional changes—it’ll be detected.

But here’s the quiet truth: even if it’s just a weird rock, the panic won’t stop. Because the real alien isn’t out there. It’s in us.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did people believe the 1938 War of the Worlds broadcast?

Many Americans trusted radio as their primary source of breaking news, and the broadcast mimicked real news bulletins with urgent tone, fake interruptions, and live-sounding reports. With no TV or internet to cross-check, listeners couldn’t verify. Plus, tensions from the looming threat of war in Europe made people primed to believe in invasion scenarios.

Is 3I/ATLAS really a potential alien spacecraft?

There’s no evidence it’s artificial. Its composition is unusual—nickel tetracarbonyl without iron—but natural explanations, like exotic interstellar chemistry or contamination from a past supernova, are still being studied. Avi Loeb’s hypothesis is provocative but unproven. Most astronomers consider it a highly unusual natural object, not proof of alien tech.

What’s the significance of the nickel tetracarbonyl emission?

Nickel tetracarbonyl is a synthetic compound rarely found in nature and typically produced in industrial settings on Earth. Its presence in an interstellar object is baffling because there’s no known natural process that creates it in space at this scale. That’s why Loeb and others are intrigued—but it doesn’t confirm intelligence. It just means we don’t yet understand all cosmic chemistry.

How did social media amplify the panic in 2025?

Unlike 1938, today’s panic spreads in seconds. A single quote from Loeb—"take a vacation before October 29"—was stripped of context and turned into viral posts. Hashtags like #AlienApproach and #3IATLAS trended globally. Algorithms pushed emotional content, and misinformation thrived. Within hours, fake NASA alerts and doomsday countdowns were circulating, even though no official agency issued such warnings.

Why did Brian Cox’s response matter?

Cox is one of the world’s most trusted science communicators. His calm, rational rebuttal helped counterbalance the fear-mongering. He didn’t dismiss Loeb—he emphasized process: data, peer review, observation. His voice reassured millions who felt overwhelmed by sensational headlines, reminding them that science isn’t about drama—it’s about patience.

Will we ever know if 3I/ATLAS is artificial?

If it passes within a few million kilometers of Earth, future missions might send probes to study it up close. But with its current trajectory, it’ll be too far by 2026. Unless it changes course—which no data suggests—it may remain a mystery. Some scientists argue that if it were truly artificial, we’d have seen signs of control or communication by now. The silence, ironically, might be the answer.